.
Feedback

UC Cans its Controversial New Logo

Deluged by a tsunami of criticism and ridicule of its new logo, the University of California announced Friday that it is suspending use of the symbol, which features a thick blue "U" and an emerging/disappearing "C."

The people spoke, and UC listened, if begrudgingly.

The University of California is suspending use of a stylized new logo that drew a loud chorus of boos and prompted an online petition that gathered more than 50,000 signatures against the symbol, UC announced Friday.

"This controversy has created a major distraction for the UCOP (University Office of the President) External Relations Division," said a statement from Daniel Dooley, UC senior vice president for external relations. 

Critics said it appeared cheap and commercial, and that, unlike the traditional university seal, lacked the dignity appropriate to one of the world's great universities. Opponents included Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom.

"The controversy has been fueled in large part by an unfortunate and false narrative, which framed the matter as an either-or choice between a venerated UC seal and a newly designed monogram," Dooley said.

UC said the new symbol was an additional branding element, not a replacement for the seal.

"And yet," Dooley acknowledged, "while I believe the design element in question would win wide acceptance over time, it also is important that we listen to and respect what has been a significant negative response by students, alumni and other members of our community.

"Therefore, I have instructed the communications team to suspend further use of the monogram. For certain applications, this process could require a measure of time to complete. In due course, we will re-evaluate this element of the visual identity system."

Like Davis Patch on Facebook

Jennifer Bernstein December 14, 2012 at 07:16 pm
I think it's funny how they keep insisting that the controversy is just because of a misunderstanding about the logo replacing the seal. That was not the case. It was clear to the community that the seal would still remain for formal communications, or other situations where a certain amount of prestige was deemed necessary. But it was also clear that the new logo would be used whenever the UC was trying to sell something to students. Rather than admit it was a terrible idea, or that the logo was just ugly, the failure is blamed on a misunderstanding by the students who are presumed not prestigious enough to appreciate the seal.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Davis Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lindsey Hickman June 13, 2013 at 09:37 pm
http://www.dailydemocrat.com/ci_23452434/apparent-suicide-at-woodland-costco
Lindsey Hickman June 13, 2013 at 09:38 pm
Someone was reported to have committed suicide in the parking lot at around 1PM today.
Lindsey Hickman June 13, 2013 at 07:33 am
I received an email yesterday that there was a fire there earlier this week. I'm going to look intoRead More it today.
Lindsey Hickman June 15, 2013 at 07:22 am
Here is the Davis Enterprise story link:Read More http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/restaurant-shutdown-may-last-till-next-week/
Roxanna Argumedo June 15, 2013 at 04:16 pm
Thank you. Hope it's up and running soon!
Two little friends hanging out
Justin Cox (Editor) May 26, 2013 at 08:59 am
Hi Katie. If somebody is interested in the kittens, who do they contact? I'll share this if you addRead More that information, either in the article or in these comments. Thanks!
Shannah Markow Whithaus June 4, 2013 at 10:45 am
Have the kittens been adopted yet?
Mark Gold May 29, 2013 at 10:12 am
At first I thought, "What now? First the IRS is investigating the Tea Party and now the OddRead More Fellows and Soroptimist?" But then, after reading the article I realize that these are pretty serious allegations if proven to be true. I'm curious what specific "foster youth" organizations have benefitted from all of this fundraising. "Foster youth" is a pretty generic phrase and could refer to any number of organizations. With all of the non-profits I have worked with, the specific charity benefitting from their work was very clearly identified (and their 501c status was never in question).