If last Wednesday’s presidential debate left you with more questions than answers, here’s your chance for the presidential candidates to address the issues that most matter to you.
The next presidential debate will be a town hall meeting format at Hofstra University in Long Island, where voters will ask President Obama and Mitt Romney about domestic and foreign policy.
Patch is asking you, our readers, to participate by submitting questions for the candidates.
All you have to do is post your question in the comments section below and we’ll send it to the Commission on Presidential Debates. The Commission is partnering with Patch's parent company Aol, along with Google and Yahoo, to take questions from web users across the country.
Don’t wait until Nov. 6 to have a say in this year’s election. Share your thoughts in the comments!
- FACEBOOK: Davis Patch | Dixon Patch
- TWITTER: Davis Patch | Dixon Patch
- NEWSLETTER: Davis Patch | Dixon Patch
As CEO of Bane Capital, would you ever agree to acquire a company that would only provide you with 2 years of most recent financial data, and that totally rejected any request from Bane for Additional Financial Information? If not, how can you deny the American Public the release of additional years of your personal Tax Information? If so, then i would question your business acumen, which you claim is the main reason you should be elected President. Patrick Spears Jupiter Florida
Mr. Romney destroyed blue collar jobs at Bain Capital and Pesident Obama has drastically cut vocational education. Because education reform ignored the 60% of students who take vocational education, in favor of the college bound students. How will you change the reform movement to help the forgotten 60%?
Why did you feel it necessary to jump in during the de-unionizing in Wisconsin, but during the teachers union strike in Chicago your lay mute? You said in your speech that you would be riight in the fight with them? Could it be because Rahm Emanual was involved?
1. " Governor Romney, you do no like <<Obamacare>> and wish to repeal it. Do you believe that all American should have access to Health Care ? If you do, how exactly do you intend to accomplish this goal ? Remember, ALL Americans (meaning citizens, permanent residents), no exceptions ! " 2. " Governor Romney, you recently publicly said that right now Americans can obtain (free or not free) health care by going to The Emergency Room. This may be useful in an acute situation, such as a heart attack, hyperglycemic attack, auto accident, but does not apply to chronic deseases, such as Diabetes Type 2 which requires continuous care not provided by any emergency room. If you agree that this is true, than do you still believe that The Emergency Room can solve all health care problems of the currently uninsured ?
1. " Governor Romney, you do no like <<Obamacare>> and wish to repeal it. Do you believe that all American should have access to Health Care ? If you do, how exactly do you intend to accomplish this goal ? Remember, ALL Americans (meaning citizens, permanent residents), no exceptions ! " 2. " Governor Romney, you recently publicly said that right now Americans can obtain (free or not free) health care by going to The Emergency Room. This may be useful in an acute situation, such as a heart attack, hyperglycemic attack, auto accident, but does not apply to chronic deseases, such as Diabetes Type 2 which requires continuous care not provided by any emergency room. If you agree that this is true, than do you still believe that The Emergency Room can solve all health care problems of the currently uninsured ?
Iraj Varzi M. D.
Do you believe that health care for all should be paid for by the wealthy and middle class? (the government) or should each poor person be required to perform some type of service to the community for their care? If they are able and they refuse, should they receive no care from the government and must rely on charity alone?
Taxes as a percentage of USA GDP have been at record lows over the last 3 years. Profits as a percentage of USA GDP have been at record highs over the last 3 years. Corporations have had record piles of cash sitting on their balance sheets over the last 3 years. With taxes already so low as percentage of GDP and profits so high as a percentage of GDP, and corporate Cash at record highs, what makes you think that indiscriminately cutting taxes further will lead to a miracle creation of 12 million jobs? If your goal is to put more money in the pockets of consumers who make up 70% of our National Economy, are you not approaching this task from the wrong end? How about increasing labors share of the GDP? Real Median Wages have been at 40 year lows. Wages as a percentage of GDP are at 40 year lows. Profits as a percentage of GDP are at 70 year highs. Reverse the outsourcing of 6 million jobs. This would stop downward pressure on REAL Median Wages. Discriminate Tax Cuts on only those firms who INsource American Jobs. Tax Punishment for firms that Outsource used to finance the externalities of such actions(ie: outsourcing leads to lower funding for schools, higher prison incarceration rates, more local government debt, poison in our childrens toys, etc etc.). Govt contracts only for US and Foreign firms that EMPLOY American workers on fullfilling the contract.
How will cutting Medicaid and raising the program over $1 trillion dollars after you appeal the Affordable Care Act help Americans? or are those American citizens included in the 47% of lazy people that think they deserve healthcare food, and housing? Please break down your healthcare plan (not goal), and how it will accommodate the uninsured children, disabled, and elderly persons specifically?
http://factcheck.org/2012/09/obamas-executive-orders/ BTW, that is less than the number of executive orders issued by President GW Bush in his first term - 160.
For Obama: Interest on the National Debt is consuming increasing amounts of Government revenues. If that debt starts threatening vital Government programs, which Government programs or subsidies or tax rebates would you consider reducing or eliminating to help balance the budget?
My question is, would you consider doing a similar debt repayment plan to eliminate the National Debt? If not, why not?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-federal-bailout-that-saved-mitt-romney-20120829 for more details)